Stablecoins: Why the Fundamentals Matter 💰🔗

As stablecoins gain traction, especially in development and humanitarian contexts, it is worth revisiting some of the fundamental risks. The 2020 paper Stablecoins 2.0: Economic Foundations and Risk-Based Models (Klages-Mundt et al.) still serves as a timely reminder that: Not all stablecoins are created equal, and their risks are often underestimated.

For custodial stablecoins (those backed by reserve funds), three core risks stand out:

• Counterparty risk: Your trust is only as strong as the custodian’s solvency and integrity. There is no deposit insurance here.
• Censorship risk: Centralised control means redemptions or issuance can be blocked.
• Economic risk: If the value of the reserve assets fluctuates, so does the value of your ‘stable’ coin. Simply being pegged does not guarantee stability.

The paper’s framework remains relevant today, particularly as institutional adoption increases. When using stablecoins in high-stakes environments such as aid or remittances, these shouldn’t be abstract concerns.

🔗 Read the paper